City of Palo Alto Homepage
TEXT VERSION 
SEARCH FOR:
design element design element design element design element


Labor Negotiations Update
design element design element design element

Since the beginning of negotiations, when the City proposed $4.5 million in annual cost concessions, the City has dropped its contract proposal to $2.5 million for FY 2010, a $2 million reduction.  Below is a table that compares Current benefits versus City's proposals. Specifically, the terms of the SEIU contract that expired in June 2009 is compared to the terms of the City's September 22 proposal and the City's Last, Best and Final Offer presented on October 16, 2009.

While other cities have resorted to layoffs, the City of Palo Alto is pursuing cost savings and taking every possible step to avoid employee layoffs.

image map
    
After five months of negotiations, the City presented its Last, Best, Final offer  to the SEIU negotiating team on October 16. This week, on October 20, the City met with SEIU and the Union rejected the City's Last, Best, Final offer. As a result, the City declared that the parties are at impasse and requested a discussion of possible means of resolving the impasse, pursuant to the City’s Merit Rules. The parties met again on October 22 but did not agree on a way to resolve the impasse.  The terms of the Last, Best, Final offer will be placed on the City Council agenda on Monday, October 26 for implementation. The parties will begin negotiations again this spring for a contract beginning July 1, 2010.  If the parties cannot come to agreement before July 1, the terms of the City's Last, Best Final offer will remain in effect until an agreement is reached.
    

   
COMPARISON CHART: Current benefits versus City's proposals     

 

Current Benefit

City proposal 9/22
(term 7/2009-6/2011)

City's Last, Best, Final proposal 10/16
(term 7/2009-6/2010)

Total Package Savings N/A
  • $2,565,542 (1st yr)
  • $2,650,765 (2nd yr)
  • $2,547,000
    • Including $1,220,000 savings for General Fund
Retirement Formula

2.7% at 55 (1)

Continue 2.7% at 55 for all current employees.

2% at 60 for new hires on or after January 1, 2010.

Continue 2.7% at 55 for all current employees.

2% at 60 for new hires on or after January 1, 2010.

Retirement Benefits
  • Total retirement funding equals 25% of employee's salary contributed annually
      
  • City pays 23% toward employee retirement plan.
      
  • Employee pays 2% toward plan.
  • Total retirement funding equals 25% of employee's salary contributed annually
      
  • City pays 18% toward employee retirement plan.
      
  • Employee pays 7% toward plan. see (2a) for sample impact 
  • Total retirement funding equals 25% of employee's salary contributed annually
      
  • Effective 11/21/09, City pays 17% toward employee retirement plan.
      
  • Effective 11/21/09, employee pays 8% toward plan. see (2b) for sample impact
      
  • Effective 6/19/10, the City will pay 19.25% toward employee retirement plan.
      
  • Effective 6/19/10, employee contribution reduced to 5.75%. see (2c) for sample impact
Tuition Reimbursement
(job-related tuition, books, professional memberships, computer equipment)
$1,000 per fiscal year per employee

$400 per fiscal year per employee

Personal computer purchase allowed once every 36 months.

No Tuition Reimbursement
Furlough Days No existing furlough program

2 days of furlough in FY 2010

No furlough in FY 2011

No furlough days in proposal
Salary Adjustments No salary increase (previous contract expired)

No salary increase is proposed

No salary wage cut proposed

No salary increase is proposed

No salary wage cut proposed

Health Care Benefits
  • City pays full premium for employee and dependents.  Premium cost for family coverage is $1,500 per month ($18,012 annually)
      
  • City is responsible for all future premium increases.

  • No change in current City-paid premiums. 
      
  • Effective after January 31, 2010 any premium increase will be shared equally by City and employee; employee share capped at 5% per year.   (3) and (4)

  •    If a premium increase equals 10% in year one, then 50% of the increase will be paid by the employee.

  • City to contribute value of employee contributions in any year to irrevocable retiree medical trust (6)
  • No change in current City-paid premiums.
      
  • Effective after January 31, 2010 any premium increase will be shared equally by City and employee; employee share capped at 5% per year.   (3) and (4)
      
  •  If a premium increase equals 10% in year one, then 50% of the increase will be paid by the employee.
      
  • This share will continue until employee share equals 10% of total premium cost.  City to pay 90% of total premium cost.  This has imposed a further cap on the employee paid share. (5)
      
  • City to contribute value of employee contributions in any year to irrevocable retiree medical trust (6)
Retiree Health Care Benefits (current retirees)

Employees hired before 1/2005:  

  • City pays full premium for retirees and portion of dependent coverage. 
        
  • In 2011, City pays 90% of dependent coverage

  
  
Employees hired after 1/2005: 

  • City pays 50% of employer contribution for retiree and dependents after 10 years vesting requirement. 
       
  • Benefit increases each subsequent year by 5%.

No change for current retirees

No change for current retirees
Retiree Health Care Benefits (future retirees)

  • No change in current City-paid premiums. (3)
      
  • Effective after any January 31, 2010 premium increase, future retirees and City share equally any premium cost increase; future retiree share capped at 5% per year (4)

  • If a premium increase equals 10% in year one, then 50% of the increase will be paid by the future retiree.
      
  • City to contribute value of retiree contributions in any year to irrevocable retiree medical trust (6)
  • No change in current City-paid premiums.
      
  • Effective after any January 31, 2010 premium increase, the City and future retirees will share equally in any cost increases to health care premiums up to a maximum of 10% premium increase. (4)
      
  • If a premium increase equals 10% in year one, then 50% of the increase will be paid by the future retiree. 
      
  • This share will continue until future retiree share equals 10% of total premium cost.  City to pay 90% of total premium cost. This has imposed a further cap on the employee paid share. (5)
      
  • City to contribute value of retiree contributions in any year to irrevocable retiree medical trust (6)

Notes
(1) For example, if an employee works for 30 years and retires at 55, the employee would receive 81% of his/her salary (2.7% of salary for each year of service)

(2) (a) Actual net impact of this change, including pre-tax deductions, would mean a married couple with 1 child making an average SEIU salary of $72,660 would pay an additional $108 each bi-weekly paycheck, or 3.9% of salary

2(b) Actual net impact of this change, including pre-tax deductions, would mean a married couple with 1 child making an average SEIU salary of $72,660 would pay an additional $129.57 each bi-weekly paycheck, or 4.6% of salary

2(c) Actual net impact of this change, including pre-tax deductions, would mean a married couple with 1 child making an average SEIU salary of $72,660 would pay an additional $81.01 each bi-weekly paycheck, or 2.9% of salary

(3) The FY 2010 Health Care Premium will be established as the base year.  Thereafter, the City will pay 100% of the base year premium, and the City and the employee will share equally in any cost increases to premiums, with the employee share capped at a maximum 5% of any yearly increase. Any additional cost increases will be paid by the City. 

(4) PERS typically adopts premium increases effective January 1 each calendar year. It is likely this cost sharing program will not take effect until January 2011.

(5) The latest proposal includes the same approach as above, but adds a further cap once the employee portion reaches 10% of the total premium cost.  SEE EXAMPLE SCENARIO BELOW:

Health Care Cost Sharing Premium for Blue Shield/Family Plan

Note: This scenario assumes that the health care premium increases 5% per year.
   
   
(6) The irrevocable retiree medical trust was set up by the City to fund future retiree health care costs.  The City's most recent actuarial study (January 2009) of our retiree medical costs, as required by GASB 45, shows an unfunded retiree medical liability of $105 million. (For more information visit http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=16668.)
 

Acceptable Use PolicyAccessibilityYour PrivacySite MapSearch EngineA-Z IndexComment FormMissing Content

 
City of Palo Alto City Hall - 250 Hamilton Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94301 | Main Telephone Number 650-329-2100 8am-5pm M-Th, Alt Fridays